All Miracles Were Part of Creation
 
Moshe Ben-Chaim
 
 
God's perfection and His complete knowledge dictate that God knew at the very outset in Creation, when specific miracles would need to unfold to achieve various goals. Maimonides explains in Avos, 5:6, that with this knowledge, God instilled precise laws timed exactly to unfold and enact all miracles in their proper hour. For example, miracles dealing with earth were created in the fabric of earth in its creation;. All miracles dealing with water were created in the fabric of water on its day of creation. This rule applies to all matter created during the six days of creation. As matter was created, specific miracles destined to unfold in the future were built into that matter. This principle attests to God's supreme and complete knowledge of all events which are to unfold throughout all time. To assume that God performed miracles only at "the time" in history, assumes that God could not anticipate the exact moment the miracle would need to be performed. It assumes ignorance on God's part.
 
Maimonides' explanation on the mishna quoted demands that man attribute complete knowledge to the Creator. Man must affirm God's wisdom and ability to create matter in such a way that specific, short term alterations in natural law would occur at exact, defined moments throughout time.
 
The question arises from the text of the mishna which states: "Ten things were created at dusk on the sixth day of creation, the mouth of the earth (which swallowed Korach), the mouth of the well (during the 40 years in the desert), the mouth of the donkey (the account of Bilam), the rainbow, the Manna, Aaron's staff, the Shamir (the worm used to miraculously cut stones) the Hebrew letters, the tool used to write the Ten Commandments, the Ten Commandments (the actual sapphire tablets) and some say even Mazikim, the burial site of Moses, the ram of Abraham, and some say even the first tongs (metal instruments used to forge other instruments)."
 
The question is, why weren't these miracles also created in their respective days like all other miracles? What is the concept taught that they were created at dusk on day 6 of creation?
 
Understanding the mark of distinction held by these few miracles will lead to the answer. So how are these miracles different than all others?
 
I believe the distinction is that these miracles incorporate that which is antithetical to the substance in which it resides. For example, the mouth of the rock which gave forth water. Rock is a purely arid substance - water is the opposite. The donkey is the most stubborn and stupid creature, yet it spoke, implying intelligence. The first tongs by definition are a contradiction. How does one make the 'first' tongs, if there are no others with which to forge that first set? The shamir worm is a tiny insect, a weak creature, yet it had the capacity to split huge stones. And the tool to write the Ten Commandments, made for sapphire. Sapphire being one of the hardest substances, the existence of the tool used to cut such a substance would be a contradiction, i.e., how can something else be harder than the hardest thing?
 
In contrast, the splitting of the Red sea for example does not incorporate a direct contradiction to water's nature, but as the passage states, God blew a strong wind to break open the waters. This means that something external to the water itself provided the separation. When Joshua caused the sun and moon to stand still, again, motion of heavenly spheres is external to the spheres themselves. Again, no inherent contradiction.
 
So why didn't God incorporate inherent contradictory miracles into their respective days of Creation? What is the purpose of their delay until dusk?
 
The answer is that it was not a 'delay', but it was an impossibility for these few miracles to inhere in a substance before the substance became complete, with all its laws. I will explain. As an example, had God brought stone into existence in a state containing moisture, the entire definition of stone would be different than what is needed for an inhabitable planet. God first had to create substances, which are defined as how they first come into existence. This is what took place on each of the 6 days of creation, i.e., matter coming into existence in distinct forms, each containing specific, essential properties. Once a certain substance exists in a desired form with its essential properties, only then can God make aberrations in its nature, without altering the actual substance. God desired that stone exist - this means an arid, hard substance. So God brought stone into existence as stone, and not as a moist object, which would not be stone. Subsequent to its creation, God can made aberrations. This is what is meant by dusk. Meaning, first, God defined matter by giving each substance specific, unique properties. This occurred during the 6 days. Only subsequent to the completion of many substances, could God incorporate a "suspension" of those properties. But suspension means, altering that which already exists.
 
Certain miracles were needed for future events, without which, catastrophe would occur. As it is God's wish to benefit man, the suspension of a specific few laws at a few times was essential to preserve mankind. God therefore made concessions to man (implied by making these miracles at the "last moment possible") by altering laws of created matter.
 
In summary, all miracles were already built into all of created matter. Miracles on the whole do not contain contradictions in material substance, but are rather multiple forces operating simultaneously. Due to the need for substance to maintain essential, structural properties, matter needed to come into existence as a defined entity. Only once existing in an essential form could God "alter" it to assist man.
 
A friend had asked how the rainbow fits into this theory. The answer is that it cannot, as it is not a suspension in a substance's laws. But it does fit into our theory if we make an amendment: We stated before that all miracles which were designed at sunset on the primordial Friday had one thing in common, i.e., they were all suspensions or contradictions in the very laws governing and actually making that substance what it is. Therefore, these few miracles, by definition, had to arrive subsequent to the creation of all matter. But we can include a rainbow into our theory if we suggest that what these few miracles had in common was something else; the impossibility of existing simultaneously with the creation of all matter. Meaning, just as in the miracle of the rock - Miriam's well - moisture had to be created subsequent to the very creation of an arid rock. So too, a rainbow could only exist subsequent to the existence of water and light, the two elements which combine to create a rainbow. A rainbow is not a new creation. A Rabbi once pointed out, God said the rainbow I "place" in the clouds as a sign. God does not say at Noah's time, "My rainbow I "created". Meaning, the rainbow always existed, even before Noah's time. But, it was created subsequent to water and light, and therefore included in the few items which had to be created last. It could not come into existence at the time of the creation of light, or at the creation of water, but subsequent to both.
 
So our revamped theory will read; All miracles created at sunset on the first Friday share the common theme that they could not be created earlier, for one of a few reasons; Either, 1) All substances had to be fixed (complete) in order that these few miracles can be alterations of these fixed substances, or 2)The miracle is not an alteration in preexisting matter, but the miracle cannot exist without the preexisting matter. Such is the case of the rainbow.


Philosophy | Tnach | New Postings | JewishTimes | Audio Archives | Suggested Reading | Live Classes | Search | Letters | Q&A's | Community Action | Volunteer | Links | Education | Chat | Banners | Classifieds | Advertise | Donate | Donors | About Us | Press | Contacts | Home

 

Mesora website designed by NYDesign.com
© 2003 Mesora of New York, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Articles may be reprinted without permission.